335 - Implants and Sports

First I want to congratulate the deaf in the cities of Palma de Mallorca, San Sebastian, Zaragoza and Getafe, to save himself and continue in the First Division Football.
For the deaf in Galicia, La Coruña especially my sympathy to them because the Deportivo La Coruna has dropped to second division. A pity, because it is a historical team after 20 years in the First Division, sorry.
Apart from the Football League because it's over and you Dicisión First we remove the worries after continuous attention, vibration and various fears. We've sweated. Although now continues the Second Division.
The issue, in which we emphasize objective is to talk about implants and sports.
Sorry for this sign. I ask that no offense, no offense because if I make this sign is because I consider it logical. Many say the implant well, some of it this way, but ...
I speak clearly. Consider the purity is as sign language and is just as indicated.
Why, I ask where is the cochlea? Where's your head?, Here and here, in ls ears.
Operations ... Where are they to place the implant? Here and is called a cochlear implant yes or no? Yes, of course. So the sign is this, not this one: brain implant. Not in the brain .. No. It is in the ear and so, after looking at books and the dictionary is logical that point behind the ear.
I'm sorry but it is, with the purity of sign language.
Beyond this, it is not the issue objetiovo. The theme is the implanted wonder can play sports? Alto, sports say no "soft" or "easy", such as table tennis, tennis, darts, bocce, dominoes, chess, ludo ... no. I'm talking about serious and tough sports like football, basketball, rugby, cycling, etc.
In football there is a danger of bumping heads or receiving a kick. In basketball there is the danger, in plays, with elbows to the head. Cycling in huy! In falls where bouncing the body and head shakes.
I believe the future of sport for the deaf in Spain, and the world too, may disappear.
Why?, More and more implemented and, for exam `what if I were president (before and I was, you know it, now I'm nothing), if I were president of a sports federation, athletes do not admit with implants. No.
You know that in the ICSD (formerly called CISS and changed AHRO by ICSD), there are rules in the Statute. One point that says to play in the Olympics or world tournaments organized by the ICSD, hearing devices are prohibited at games. Are prohibited and must be removed.
We also have the implanted devices since they can be removed, as we know, but ...
What about the inside? What if one day have an encounter with the head? It would take him to hospital with serious problems. What?
After the family suffer because denounce in court demanding damages ... suffer the papers, discussions ... I do not accept that man! Do you understand?
By the way, that's a problem to be studied. Apart from this, also ask: why have created the implant?
I think that having hearing from small appliances, cords auqneu formerly with the device in his pocket, so great and that advancing the time were declining to appear after ear headphones.
I ask again, because life today is very advanced, we twenty-first century technology and has experience, a lot of advanced technology ... why do good and good headphones?
Inside or outside the ear, as you like, good and good to match the implant or better than implants? Why not fight to do so? Headphones implants better than why not?
I say this because they suffer the interventions to register the devices ... hmmm!
There are three things: the implant, the device and the magnet. Three things for what? With a single instrument can, being tired, take it off. To take it off and is completely free and you can do sports, you want to, dangerous or not dangerous. Ductile, such as darts or bocce. Or the rugby at home.
Well, we want to know why they have not.
We know how much the hearing aids whistle and the implant does not, but good.
I am not against the implant, because it is a freedom of everyone who wants to do with your body. I wash my hands.
Per I do not, you might think by age, finally, I do not like anything, I personally do not like it.
My opinion is free.
Why implants? ... I'll tell a story:
I had a friend when I was young, and lived Angel Calafell, that of the long beards that many have known, and was president of the Mutual.
Inside was a voice, my friend. That vocal live in Badalona, ​​forgiveness lived, lived in Badalona and whose sign identifying remember correctly, I forgot your name too, but it was a strong kid with a mustache and glasses, brown hair.
He told me before when he lived, told me he was going to volunteer at a clinic for surgery of the ears. Again and again, he said he paid the support, what he did was like being a guinea pig.
Well, it was their problem.
Was frequently, until one day I went to the Mutual, and after greeting deaf friends asked him. No one knew anything ... Until I learned much later that he had died by the operations of the ears, of the two. He died because it affected the brain.
Disappeared long ago that when they were pioneering studies of operations and do you understand? Now that does not happen, it was before ...
All this gave me a strong impression that I was marked in the memory. To me.
Thereafter, make two or three years I was in Ceuta, where I was born, and stayed two years working in the newspaper as proof of stay in the same city where I was born. With friends, family and everything.
Well, in those two years I met a deaf man who still lives in Ceuta.
He explained that he had already been implemented but in a year or two broke down and left the implant. Did not want him because he broke his head.
It's normal, normal to want to hear, I agree it should encourage them, but they think that late age is very difficult. Hear well with the implant, yes I agree, but the brain does not coordinate. There is no coordination ... why?
The brain has not been brought up in the words sound and suddenly receiving all ... it takes a long time to adapt and taught by speech therapists to learn how words sound.
Implemented may be that many believe they are much better and perfect. Yes, I agree, yes, yes. Because they would have traces of hearing before being operated and implemented and then hear perfectly. I agree because I have experience in capturing the sounds and the brain are well coordinated.
But some who talk about how great that hearing, in accordance but ... I recently met a girl who has a cochlear implant and talk (you know sign language) and knew sign language ... has not lost the implant? Well let that pass.
That girl speaks very well and was on the computer while I was talking behind their backs, I was with a woman listener. Ell spoke and turned around thinking I was talking with another woman listener. It was not like I was speaking to her and of course I do not understand anything. Hear the voice, yes, but the phrases "?. No.
Why the implant, then? Okay, enough! No more talk about this.
I ask everyone not enfande when I speak of the implant, because it is, here in the brain.
You can indicate that sign, I respect you because everyone has their way of expression with your hands.

I have only intended to ask how well you think the implants can participate in sports competition series?
Can you? "After you become responsible if something happens ...? You have to go to court, discutior with relatives, hmmm!, All that is in questions.
It is a pity because the implanted grow, if everyone is talking about, if all they hear ... the Olympics for the Deaf will disappear.
Why?, All deaf now living will be more major sport "will do the same? "International competitions? Mmmm, I doubt it.
In an age that will say enough is enough, football, basketball, etc.. Enough is enough ... The body will not hold more.
It should open the door to young people, but if young people have implants ... participate in these sports I doubt it.

333 - Deaflympics and Greece

Now speak of Greece. The news came after days of advertising, from the troubles of Greece for the debt, although it is not clear how much.
Europe supports Greece for the country from falling into the abyss of danger. This helps give a little break to Greece, which can be short because ...
"You know that when the euro appeared, broke the world economy. With the wars as well. Previously, each country had its currency and rallied in Europe, in the euro, was that some countries did not have sufficient capacity to overcome that economy: Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy (but also slightly less).
That happens because of capitalism, creating the euro broke all the schemes of the countries.
Germany and France had the power of capitalism and these are now sent in Europe, while other countries are not strong enough, in economics, to lead.
Aid to countries with European bank funds, which Germany and France support with their money, sinking more and more to other countries.
Greece has already received financial aid, it does not. It was useless.
Now the second opportunity to receive financial assistance and insurance later again sink.
Why sink? Why? Banks that give them the money makes them assume the risk premium.
The risk premium, covers people who invest their money (investors), is very high and the ministries of each country must repay the debt and repay the debt they do with interest too high for the country to sink capital more.
This problem is difficult to solve, because each time, more and more assume the greed, the desire to become rich immediately immense (speculation) and this affects the countries.
Fortunately, Spain is a big country, a country is mediating between the third world and Europe.
Here's help in hiding, not shown publicly.
Portugal, Greece, Ireland, Iceland, Finland, etc. are small countries whose production is not enough to overcome the rest of the level of the economy and that greatly affects the other countries except Germany and France because they have the power of capital.
This problem affects the deaf who participate in Olympic Games.
Why? Apart from the hearing world, sport, for example, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) does not recognize the ICSD and that affects a lot because capital is diverted towards another called Paralympic Committee.
The International Paralympic Committee does receive financial aid officer, because it is recognized as a sports committee, while the hearing impaired is not yet recognized as a separate Committee and is separated. You do not receive capital support clear?
In this issue you can find a solution to contact with other committees and speak clearly with the Government. Stop.
-------------------------------------
I now explain why deaf leaders are closed and withdrawn into information. Why? The Government, local councils, federations of listeners, the provincial political parties ... never shut things are going to do for the benefit of all people. It's easy to just looking at web pages, then informs entirely on what you are doing. From the Congress of Spain, with the minutes of meetings, discussions, debates, all, are reported. Less deaf why?
The CNSE not well informed of what he does, I shut everything and that's not good. This is a democracy and here we must know everything about how to be confident.
If you do not report, we give less confident and less participation going.
There should be a clear transparency in information, with this transparency, everyone will be happy because we know how things work in the CNSE, the sports federations of Spain and Catalunya Sports Federation.
That in the deaf world, more than being locked into ghettos, is also closed at the level of information.
As a journalist I want everything to be open, all information in the service of the deaf who need that information, to talk, to find out opinions and to learn to criticize.
In a country with a democratic state with freedom of expression and freedom of opinion, everyone has to be informed.
Just ask transparency in leading organizations of the deaf. Do not keep quiet the things that are discovered over time and that will hurt both leaders deaf and deaf to them.
Now I want to talk about something else very important Application form Organizer for the Deaflympics.
"The presidents of federations in the Committee? NO
Be separate, they work in their federation with the aim to train players and athletes, so that in the future from entering the Olympic teams.
The president of the FEDS can not be inside the Organizing Committee, his work is in the Federation, like the president of the Catalan Federation of the Organizing Committee "within? NO. Them apart.
Just as employees who work on their federations, not the Committee. NO. Or any member of the Federation can not hold two offices. NO
No Olympic Committee authorizes it. Can only be in some Olympic Committee meetings to inform how they work, how they can participate, players and athletes. They can not hold two positions, is prohibited and are incompatible. Is that clear?

The Organizing Committee and the nomination must be made by persons outside the Federations and ... well, I'm a little surprised that the president of the FESOCA (Catalan Federation of the Deaf) is within the Committee What does it look?
That does not paint anything, can not occupy a cultural federation, labor, social action sports.
That does not count. It is best if you want to engage in organizing the Olympic bid, should resign as president of the Federation and get to work.
Like Martinez, Garcia and Munoz also ...
The three must resign from their positions in the federations to take the OC.
In the history of the Olympics, no president has made a Bid Organizing Committee and Olympic Committee of the Deaf, none.
It is the first time, and in Spain, they do so and that is very rare.
There are many dark things, ask why transparency in procedures and ways of working of the Federations.

331 - Deaflympics event

Today I want to clarify many things.
First: We are not, InfoSord TV, at war with anyone. Only just give us real information of things happening.
If many believe or not believe, gives us the same, only inform.
As many of you know, I am the founder of the FEDS (when Peñacoba was many years struggling to create the Federation, and then chaplain asked me to take responsibility and I managed to create in two months, many presidents signed before a notary Sports Clubs I say true) and much of it.
Spain participated in the Sports Games for the Deaf in Bulgaria, with sixty athletes and the Sports Council gave us a grant and participation in international tournaments, never as participation in Olympics because it recognized the Deaf Olympics. Is that clear?
For that and other things I have experienced what I mean.
As Guillem Carles only ask you have respect and to say "No war between 3 leaders and that" ... 'it' has a name: that INFOSORD TV, so more respect.
If you say that bear three years in the Bid Organizing Committee ... how come there is no official document that recognizes that committee?

I consulted the National Sports Council ... NOTHING OFFICIAL ABOUT Deaflympics.

Instead of the Spanish Paralympic Committee is a lot of documents, like this one that I will show you: have a very good organization on the development of Paralympic sports. Deaf people have nothing.
It is important to be included in the ADOP (supporting Paralympic Sport Goal) because many companies give money for it.

They are preparing soon, London (England) after the Olympics and the Paralympics in 2012, already knows that officially have already prepared the grant in full.
The deaf, for Deaflympics have nothing.

Again, the Higher Sports Council there is no record of the Olympic Games for the Deaf in any year. Only the Paralympic Games since Rome in 1960 to Beijing 2008. Therefore there is no legal basis to warrant a nomination.

Another very important thing. Members of the Organizing Committee of Olympic Games Bid for the Deaf Summer 2017 in Barcelona, ​​has started the cart before the horse.

It is normal to wait until September in Rome to see if the ICSD provides the organization of the Olympic Games and then ask for money and approval.
It is the obligation to go to Rome with all confirmed and well resolved.

Advise sports leaders who have the Organizing Committee to show the public the documents say. Show him and let him read who can read.
They will not convince us with words and more words. Show documents.
Or at least a senior member of Government or the Government confirm that approves the nomination in front of everyone.

I do not understand how you talk about integration, you never want bringing back.

I do not understand that talk of the illusion of young players you never organizáis school sports championships, where athletes may leave future.

Afirméis not understand that there are 5,000 athletes already confirmed to come to Deraflympics 2017 if there is still no guarantee. Will be that those 5,000 athletes would like to come to Barcelona, ​​which is another thing.
'm Talking in this way but it is what it is.
For the Government to support the deaf Olympic sport, you must participate with the Spanish Paralympic Committee, why are integrated Pedro Manuel García Sanz, Raquel Moreno Solovera Nieves, Marisol Gonzalez Acedo and Javier Soto Rey?

If both say that you support young athletes ... do it for them! And do not do as they're doing ... for yourselves.
What's interview with Jordi Hereu, my friend than my boss, it's funny because Jordi Hereu has spoken on his own and what you caught in a political commitment (rally), but Jordi Hereu is unable to convince companies give money if you do not have the support of HPOD.
The agreements are available in conference tables official documents, not on the street.
Carles says that I'm not there ... no need to me. My relationships with institutions and there are plenty enough for me to be informed of everything. Still, I need not vote no because I do not show anything. I have enough to InfoSord.
On the other hand, I do not speak ill of anyone, only informed of things as they are. I told you at first is not my intention to offend anyone. Just say the logic of things.

In short, you follow the wrong path.

330 - On the press conference Deaflympics

-
PRESS CONFERENCE ON Deaflympics
Today I will talk about the press conference
I have been hasty in calling this press conference.
They have offered a clearer version of what they want with that press conference.
I do not know politicians. Not just with words but with deeds and documents.
So far only have made a city charter and sight unseen.
I was surprised, because, as previously claimed 8,000,000 euros ($ 1,331,088,000 of the old pesetas) which asked the City Council, now comes the president of the FEDS stating that at first demanded EUR 40,000,000 (6655 .440.000 old pesetas) and then declined.
To fall back.
Otherwise. In Spain there is no Deaf Olympic Committee. Yes there Paralympic Committee that is affiliated with the FEDS.
Therefore, the only one who can organize the Olympic Games Paralympic Committee, as it has five national federations (in Spain), and is recognized by the BOE in 1993.
That in 2017 25 years are met in Barcelona 92 ​​Olympics, has nothing to do with what is to be organized.
We'll see. For a municipality to grant approval to present Olympic bid must take into account the income generated Summer Olympics.
The deaf, their 'Olympics' never exceed 10,000 persons and that sells nothing compared to the 8,000,000 euros to be sought.
That does not interest either the City or the state.
What Slovenia has nothing to do. It's another thing.
But the failure of the Winter Games for the Deaf in Slovenia, has been meditating on the feasibility of granting authorization for the candidacy of summer of 2017 at Barcelona. Logical.
I stand by what I said in my previous video.
If you want to host an Olympics, you must do so within the Paralympic Committee, separating the rest of handicapped deaf. Since Paralympic Committee is the only still has the support of governments, while the DSCR does not have the support of most of the international Olympic committees.
It's a risky bet for any government agency.
In the press conference have not clarified anything, only marginal words that do not lead to anything good.
Have you submitted documents that you support from the State Government to the Government?, We have not seen any. Only a letter from the City Council that does not mean anything.
What has made the city of Barcelona is right. Have studied the feasibility of the request to submit application and have said no. It did not have to be met with the Organizing Committee of the nomination because there is not yet officially approved by the Government. Not recorded in any BOE.
You have done a lot of illusions without knowing anything about it, just the idea of ​​EUR 40,000,000 by 8,000,000 and then changed from the figure of something weird. Because the difference is great and it opens the eyes of anyone.
Well, I just want you to have luck on Thursday, but I advise you, not around where you must fight. You must meet with the Paralympic Committee and speak clearly.
Anyway, I warn you again. You walk the wrong way.
-

329 - Deaflympics candidacy possible failure

-

Today I will talk about a very important focus for the Deaf Olympics in 2017.
But first I want to express that today I will speak no intention of harming anyone, just going to explain the reasons why I talk this way.

I hope not offend anyone, because it's true I'm going to talk like that.
Already commented in a video blog, about a year and a half, he doubted that it could hold the Olympics in Barcelona for the Deaf, 2017.
Before easily explained what he saw irregular. Now I will speak out of three important things.
First: To organize a bid for the Deaf Olympics, summer, good in 2017, prepare well, well, everything.
As in Spain for years that sports are never serious, really, for example, soccer leagues, basketball leagues, swimming, athletics and several more officially and seriously ... not as groups of friends who come to play a game without training or anything ...
Any authority to see that, doubt his seriousness.
Well, as I said before, to organize a candidate to be well done, as well as for example, created an organizing committee for the nomination, no Olympic Organizing Committee, NO. For the candidate that is another matter.
The organizing committee of the bid for the Deaf Olympics in Barcelona 2017, should first contact the Spanish Paralympic Committee, where talk meeting and presented the project of Barcelona's candidacy.
Already studied by the Spanish Paralympic Committee, is passed to the Spanish Olympic Committee, which would hear the draft Barcelona's bid to develop the Deaflympics in 2017.
If the Spanish Olympic Committee that looks good, give notice to the Government of Spain, not of Catalonia, in Spain it communicates.
If the Government of Spain would examine the project and approval, then the papers would go to the Government, the General Secretariat of Sports, which scrutinize and if you look good, they approve. Not support it. Condone what is different.
Once approved, all that, then go to the city of Barcelona where they would contact, they talk and presented the project application.
If the City agrees, it should approve, NO SUPPORT, IF APPROVED, with papers sealed.
This is the first part.
The second: so far only been introduced this deaf leaders themselves speaking, lecturing, bloggers, much more. Neither the government nor representatives of the Paralympic Committee, nor the representatives of the Olympic Committee nor the Secretary General of Sports of the Generalitat de Catalunya, have spoken anything about it.
Only single words of support and assistance ... nothing else. But not in a formal meeting, the full City Council, which speaks of the issue and try to cooperate formally with the Organising Committee Barcelona's bid for the Summer Olympic Games for the Deaf, 2017.
Therefore, if there are no documents to support this project, there is nothing approved. Only promises of support. This support is not the same as approving a proposed Olympic bid. "Sure?
The third point: You, Deaf sports leaders from Spain and do written protestáis launched soon, on May 16, the media (press, radio and television) to denounce the marginalization protest ... no.
It's a misstep, which can affect relationships in the future.
Why? First know that "All who made propaganda?, sports leaders themselves deaf, they have spoken without official backing, sealed and demonstrated.
Without it, they have spoken on their own, each leader deaf sports in Spain and Catalonia.
Blame it on themselves, who spoke lying. This may be lying or may not be.
But never has to talk to and is approved if there is no documentation to support that if approved by the Government or the City Council.
Third place: the economic ... the Committee has said it has substantially reduced the budget to EUR 8,000,000.
Would you have thought? A City Hall will give you 8,000,000 dollars? What a representative body of the deaf who have never done competitive sport every week?
Think about that. Parties do once in a long time in football I have heard it is scarce. Well ... That?, Authorities look with a magnifying glass long before adopting a financial thing.
But as it is poorly planned, the organizing committee of the bid for the Summer Olympic Games for the Deaf, 2017 ... and have exaggerated advertising for all deaf people in Spain believe it. I still do not believe it, and I doubt, they give you to organize all that.
Why? It brings bad planning: TOTAL FAILURE.
You do not have wished to have people who have experience in the sports world, the opposite: hate. Do not you want to view and ask, do not want to join then.
You have no experience in the world of sport, both as listeners deaf.
You are not going the right direction. Your route now is a little crooked and careful, because maybe in the future it hundáis. We must tread carefully. No abuse to authorities and other acts of marginalization ... NO.
The City Council never approved the bid to Barcelona, ​​has never been adopted. It has only supported and encouraged to see if it will or will not.
It is normal that the Provincial de Barcelona, ​​Barcelona City Council follow regarding the Olympics. If one says no, the other will say no. It's normal.
Things are not as easy as you imagine, deaf sports leaders.
Things are systematically complicated, very difficult to do well, it should have experience in sports and sports event planners.
Sorry. Ye look through the glass of another color as your eyes. I see it very clear from the beginning I warned, I said. That is not going to win anything.
Mainly because it is normal in Spain there is no seriousness in the sport of the deaf, honestly serious, no.
With improvisation remember a day such a meeting, this will be another day. That's not ... I will not explain further. Everything is said and attention! All deaf leaders in the sports world, this failure hurts. It hurts more when I have already warned that goes astray. Anyway.

329 - posible fracaso candidatura Deaflympics

-



Hoy voy a hablar de un tema muy importante centrado en las Olimpíadas para Sordos 2017.
Pero primero quiero expresaros que hoy voy a hablar sin ánimo de dañar a nadie, solo voy a explicar las razones del por qué hablo de esta manera.
Espero que no se ofenda nadie, porque es verdad lo que voy a hablar así.
Ya lo comenté en un videoblog, hará un año y medio, en que dudaba de que se pudiera celebrar en Barcelona la Olimpíada para Sordos de 2017.
Antes expliqué de forma sencilla lo que veía irregular. Ahora voy a hablar claro de tres cosas importantes.
Primero: Para organizar una candidatura de olimpiadas para sordos, de verano, buen en el 2017, hay que preparar bien, bien, todo.
Como en España hace años que nunca se hacen deportes serios, realmente, por ejemplo: ligas de fútbol; ligas de baloncesto; natación; atletismo y varios más de manera oficial y seriamente… no como grupos de amigos que acuden para jugar un partido sin entrenamientos ni nada…
Cualquier autoridad que vea eso, duda de su seriedad.
Bueno, como decía antes, para organizar una candidatura hay que hacerla bien, bien como por ejemplo, al crearse un Comité organizador de la candidatura, no Comité Organizador de las Olimpiadas, NO. De la candidatura que es otra cosa.
El comité organizador de la candidatura para los Juegos Olímpicos para Sordos en Barcelona 2017, debía primero contactar con el Comité Paralímpico Español, donde en reunión se hablaría y se presentaría el proyecto de la candidatura de Barcelona.
Ya estudiado por el Comité Paralímpico Español, se pasa al Comité Olímpico Español, donde se escucharía el proyecto de la candidatura de Barcelona para desarrollar los Juegos Olímpicos para Sordos de 2017.
Si el Comité Olímpico Español ve bien eso, lo comunica al Gobierno de España, no al de Catalunya, al de España se lo comunica.
Si el Gobierno de España estudiara el proyecto y diera el visto bueno, entonces los papeles pasarían a la Generalitat, a la Secretaría General de Deportes, que lo estudiarían y si lo ven bien, lo aprueban. No lo apoyan. Lo aprueban que es diferente.
Una vez aprobado, todo eso, después va al Ayuntamiento de Barcelona donde se contactaría, se hablaría y se presentaría el proyecto de la candidatura.
Si el Ayuntamiento acepta, lo debería aprobar, NO APOYARLO, SI APROBARLO, con papeles sellados.
Esto es la primera parte.
La segunda: hasta ahora sólo han presentado todo esto los mismos líderes sordos hablando, dando conferencias, en blogs, en muchas cosas más. Ni el Gobierno, ni los representantes del Comité Paralímpico, ni los representantes del Comité Olímpico, ni el Secretario General de Deportes de la Generalitat de Catalunya, han pronunciado nada sobre ello.
Solo palabras sueltas, de apoyos y ayudas… nada más. Pero no en una reunión oficial, el Pleno del Ayuntamiento, donde se hable del tema y se pruebe oficialmente para colaborar con el Comité Organizador de la candidatura de Barcelona para los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano para Sordos de 2017.
Por lo tanto, si no existen documentos que avalen ese proyecto, no hay nada aprobado. Solo promesas de apoyo. Esto, el apoyo, no es lo mismo que aprobar un proyecto de candidatura olímpica. ¿Claro?
El tercer punto: Vosotros, los líderes deportivos sordos de España protestáis y hacéis escritos convocando pronto, el 16 de mayo, a los medios de comunicación (prensa, radio y televisión) para denunciar la protesta por la marginación… no.
Es un mal paso, que puede afectar las relaciones en el futuro.
¿Por qué? en primer lugar ¿Todos sabéis que quién ha hecho propaganda?, los mismos líderes deportivos de sordos, los mismos han hablado sin respaldo oficial, sellado y demostrado.
Sin ello, han hablado por su cuenta, cada líder deportivo de sordos de España y de Catalunya.
La culpa es de ellos mismos, que hablaron mintiendo. Esto de mentir puede ser o no puede ser.
Pero nunca se ha de hablar que ya está aprobado si no existe documentación que avale que sí está aprobado por el Gobierno o el Ayuntamiento.
Del tercer lugar: los medios económicos… el Comité ha dicho que han rebajado sustancialmente el presupuesto hasta 8.000.000 de euros.
¿Lo habéis pensado bien? ¿Un Ayuntamiento os va a dar 8.000.000 de euros? ¿A una entidad representativa de los sordos que nunca han hecho deporte de competición todas las semanas?
Pensad eso. Hacéis partidos una vez cada tanto tiempo, en fútbol he oído que es escaso. Pues… ¿eso?, las autoridades miran con lupa mucho antes de aprobar una cosa económica.
Bien, como está mal planificado, el Comité organizador de la candidatura para los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano para Sordos de 2017… y han exagerado la publicidad para que todos los sordos de España lo crean. Yo aún no lo creía, y sigo dudando, que os den para organizar todo eso.
¿Por qué? La mala planificación trae eso: FRACASO TOTAL.
Vosotros no habéis querido contar con personas que tienen experiencia en el mundo del deporte, al contrario: los odiáis. No queréis consultar y preguntar, no queréis colaborar, pues.
Vosotros no tenéis experiencia en el mundo del deporte, tanto de oyentes como de sordos.
No váis por buen camino. Vuestra vía ahora está un poco torcida y, ¡cuidado!, porque puede que en el futuro os hundáis. Hay que andar con cuidado. No maltratar a las autoridades con gestos de marginación y otros… NO.
El Ayuntamiento nunca aprobó dar la candidatura de Barcelona, nunca lo ha aprobado. Solo ha apoyado y animado para ver si va o no va.
Es normal que la Diputación de Barcelona, siga al Ayuntamiento de Barcelona respecto a las Olimpíadas. Si uno dice no, el otro dirá no. Es normal.
Las cosas no son tan fáciles como pensáis vosotros, los líderes deportivos de sordos.
Las cosas son sistemáticamente complicadas, muy difíciles y para hacerlo bien, bien se debe tener experiencia en el mundo del deporte y en organización de eventos deportivos.
Lo siento mucho. Vosotros miráis a través de otro cristal el color según vuestros ojos. Yo lo veo muy claro, desde el principio os avisé, ya lo dije. Así no se va a ganar nada.
Principalmente porque es normal que en España no existe seriedad en el deporte de los sordos, sinceramente serios, No hay.
Con improvisaciones un día tal se acuerda un encuentro, dia tal van a otro. Eso no… más no voy a explicar. Todo está ya dicho y ¡atención! A todos los líderes sordos del mundo del deporte: este fracaso duele. Duele más cuando ya os he avisado que va por mal camino. En fin.
-

329 - posible fracaso candidatura Deaflympics

-



Hoy voy a hablar de un tema muy importante centrado en las Olimpíadas para Sordos 2017.
Pero primero quiero expresaros que hoy voy a hablar sin ánimo de dañar a nadie, solo voy a explicar las razones del por qué hablo de esta manera.
Espero que no se ofenda nadie, porque es verdad lo que voy a hablar así.
Ya lo comenté en un videoblog, hará un año y medio, en que dudaba de que se pudiera celebrar en Barcelona la Olimpíada para Sordos de 2017.
Antes expliqué de forma sencilla lo que veía irregular. Ahora voy a hablar claro de tres cosas importantes.
Primero: Para organizar una candidatura de olimpiadas para sordos, de verano, buen en el 2017, hay que preparar bien, bien, todo.
Como en España hace años que nunca se hacen deportes serios, realmente, por ejemplo: ligas de fútbol; ligas de baloncesto; natación; atletismo y varios más de manera oficial y seriamente… no como grupos de amigos que acuden para jugar un partido sin entrenamientos ni nada…
Cualquier autoridad que vea eso, duda de su seriedad.
Bueno, como decía antes, para organizar una candidatura hay que hacerla bien, bien como por ejemplo, al crearse un Comité organizador de la candidatura, no Comité Organizador de las Olimpiadas, NO. De la candidatura que es otra cosa.
El comité organizador de la candidatura para los Juegos Olímpicos para Sordos en Barcelona 2017, debía primero contactar con el Comité Paralímpico Español, donde en reunión se hablaría y se presentaría el proyecto de la candidatura de Barcelona.
Ya estudiado por el Comité Paralímpico Español, se pasa al Comité Olímpico Español, donde se escucharía el proyecto de la candidatura de Barcelona para desarrollar los Juegos Olímpicos para Sordos de 2017.
Si el Comité Olímpico Español ve bien eso, lo comunica al Gobierno de España, no al de Catalunya, al de España se lo comunica.
Si el Gobierno de España estudiara el proyecto y diera el visto bueno, entonces los papeles pasarían a la Generalitat, a la Secretaría General de Deportes, que lo estudiarían y si lo ven bien, lo aprueban. No lo apoyan. Lo aprueban que es diferente.
Una vez aprobado, todo eso, después va al Ayuntamiento de Barcelona donde se contactaría, se hablaría y se presentaría el proyecto de la candidatura.
Si el Ayuntamiento acepta, lo debería aprobar, NO APOYARLO, SI APROBARLO, con papeles sellados.
Esto es la primera parte.
La segunda: hasta ahora sólo han presentado todo esto los mismos líderes sordos hablando, dando conferencias, en blogs, en muchas cosas más. Ni el Gobierno, ni los representantes del Comité Paralímpico, ni los representantes del Comité Olímpico, ni el Secretario General de Deportes de la Generalitat de Catalunya, han pronunciado nada sobre ello.
Solo palabras sueltas, de apoyos y ayudas… nada más. Pero no en una reunión oficial, el Pleno del Ayuntamiento, donde se hable del tema y se pruebe oficialmente para colaborar con el Comité Organizador de la candidatura de Barcelona para los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano para Sordos de 2017.
Por lo tanto, si no existen documentos que avalen ese proyecto, no hay nada aprobado. Solo promesas de apoyo. Esto, el apoyo, no es lo mismo que aprobar un proyecto de candidatura olímpica. ¿Claro?
El tercer punto: Vosotros, los líderes deportivos sordos de España protestáis y hacéis escritos convocando pronto, el 16 de mayo, a los medios de comunicación (prensa, radio y televisión) para denunciar la protesta por la marginación… no.
Es un mal paso, que puede afectar las relaciones en el futuro.
¿Por qué? en primer lugar ¿Todos sabéis que quién ha hecho propaganda?, los mismos líderes deportivos de sordos, los mismos han hablado sin respaldo oficial, sellado y demostrado.
Sin ello, han hablado por su cuenta, cada líder deportivo de sordos de España y de Catalunya.
La culpa es de ellos mismos, que hablaron mintiendo. Esto de mentir puede ser o no puede ser.
Pero nunca se ha de hablar que ya está aprobado si no existe documentación que avale que sí está aprobado por el Gobierno o el Ayuntamiento.
Del tercer lugar: los medios económicos… el Comité ha dicho que han rebajado sustancialmente el presupuesto hasta 8.000.000 de euros.
¿Lo habéis pensado bien? ¿Un Ayuntamiento os va a dar 8.000.000 de euros? ¿A una entidad representativa de los sordos que nunca han hecho deporte de competición todas las semanas?
Pensad eso. Hacéis partidos una vez cada tanto tiempo, en fútbol he oído que es escaso. Pues… ¿eso?, las autoridades miran con lupa mucho antes de aprobar una cosa económica.
Bien, como está mal planificado, el Comité organizador de la candidatura para los Juegos Olímpicos de Verano para Sordos de 2017… y han exagerado la publicidad para que todos los sordos de España lo crean. Yo aún no lo creía, y sigo dudando, que os den para organizar todo eso.
¿Por qué? La mala planificación trae eso: FRACASO TOTAL.
Vosotros no habéis querido contar con personas que tienen experiencia en el mundo del deporte, al contrario: los odiáis. No queréis consultar y preguntar, no queréis colaborar, pues.
Vosotros no tenéis experiencia en el mundo del deporte, tanto de oyentes como de sordos.
No váis por buen camino. Vuestra vía ahora está un poco torcida y, ¡cuidado!, porque puede que en el futuro os hundáis. Hay que andar con cuidado. No maltratar a las autoridades con gestos de marginación y otros… NO.
El Ayuntamiento nunca aprobó dar la candidatura de Barcelona, nunca lo ha aprobado. Solo ha apoyado y animado para ver si va o no va.
Es normal que la Diputación de Barcelona, siga al Ayuntamiento de Barcelona respecto a las Olimpíadas. Si uno dice no, el otro dirá no. Es normal.
Las cosas no son tan fáciles como pensáis vosotros, los líderes deportivos de sordos.
Las cosas son sistemáticamente complicadas, muy difíciles y para hacerlo bien, bien se debe tener experiencia en el mundo del deporte y en organización de eventos deportivos.
Lo siento mucho. Vosotros miráis a través de otro cristal el color según vuestros ojos. Yo lo veo muy claro, desde el principio os avisé, ya lo dije. Así no se va a ganar nada.
Principalmente porque es normal que en España no existe seriedad en el deporte de los sordos, sinceramente serios, No hay.
Con improvisaciones un día tal se acuerda un encuentro, dia tal van a otro. Eso no… más no voy a explicar. Todo está ya dicho y ¡atención! A todos los líderes sordos del mundo del deporte: este fracaso duele. Duele más cuando ya os he avisado que va por mal camino. En fin.
-